- Published on
Born That Way... NOT!
“Homosexuals are born that way. It’s not a choice. Who would choose to be gay?” If you are one of the folks who is saying that, please stop.
It makes you look ignorant. It really does.
I understand that it seems to be a great argument, especially to counter the Religious Wrong. It puts the problem back on God’s doorstep: Blame Him. He made us this way
I understand how framing homosexuality as some kind of unfortunate accident of birth might seem strategically savvy, because it takes advantage of some of the (limited) progress this country has made in responding appropriately to people with disability.
And maybe you do believe that God made you that way, and maybe you do wish you weren’t gay, and maybe you experience your homosexuality as some kind of birth defect. Okay, if that’s your truth, then you should say, “I was born that way. I didn’t choose it. I wish I had been straight.”
But stop saying that all of us were born that way. It shows your lack of understanding of half of the human race, including half the population of homosexuals, as well as an abysmal ignorance of global, political, social, spiritual, biological, and economic realities.
I am, of course, talking about the women. Many lesbians do experience our lesbianism as a choice. Many lesbians have grounds to wonder who in their right minds would choose heterosexuality. And many of us find it problematic to make any assumptions about any women being “born heterosexual.”
It makes you look ignorant. It really does.
I understand that it seems to be a great argument, especially to counter the Religious Wrong. It puts the problem back on God’s doorstep: Blame Him. He made us this way
I understand how framing homosexuality as some kind of unfortunate accident of birth might seem strategically savvy, because it takes advantage of some of the (limited) progress this country has made in responding appropriately to people with disability.
And maybe you do believe that God made you that way, and maybe you do wish you weren’t gay, and maybe you experience your homosexuality as some kind of birth defect. Okay, if that’s your truth, then you should say, “I was born that way. I didn’t choose it. I wish I had been straight.”
But stop saying that all of us were born that way. It shows your lack of understanding of half of the human race, including half the population of homosexuals, as well as an abysmal ignorance of global, political, social, spiritual, biological, and economic realities.
I am, of course, talking about the women. Many lesbians do experience our lesbianism as a choice. Many lesbians have grounds to wonder who in their right minds would choose heterosexuality. And many of us find it problematic to make any assumptions about any women being “born heterosexual.”
Yes, believe it or not, the lesbian experience is not just the gay male experience with a bow on its head, like Minnie Mouse. It’s more like Alice’s trip through the looking glass.
So… is it a choice?
Here in the US, until the last century, women could not practice heterosexuality outside of marriage without extremely severe consequences. I am talking about the stigma of the notorious “fallen” or tragically “ruined” woman, with the searing rejection of out-of-wedlock children—often relinquished for adoption under economic, or religious, or social, or all-three pressures.
On the other hand, the socially sanctioned expression of heterosexuality—marriage—was a dangerous and degrading institution for women. In an era before birth control, women could not deny their husbands sex, and this could mean serial pregnancies for two decades or more… with the attendant toll on both psychological and physical health. It often meant too many children to protect or provide for. The rates for infant mortality were nearly as high as the rates for death in childbirth. Wives could be raped and beaten with impunity, could not inherit money, could not own their own wages, vote, serve on juries (critical factor in rape trials), could not own their children. Husbands could have insubordinate wives incarcerated indefinitely in mental asylums. This was still true through the middle of the twentieth century. It goes without saying she was expected to do the most low-paid and menial work.
The woman with enough self-esteem to insist on control of her body; the woman with dreams of creative, entrepreneurial, or intellectual work; and the woman whose childhood experiences of male sexuality were traumatic enough to preclude her fulfilling the obligations of the marriage bed had two choices: celibacy or lesbianism. Many women chose lesbianism. And many of these, not surprisingly, were women of achievement. Scratch around under the surface of these thousands of exceptional, historical spinsters, and you will usually find the lesbianism.
So… is it a choice?
Here in the US, until the last century, women could not practice heterosexuality outside of marriage without extremely severe consequences. I am talking about the stigma of the notorious “fallen” or tragically “ruined” woman, with the searing rejection of out-of-wedlock children—often relinquished for adoption under economic, or religious, or social, or all-three pressures.
On the other hand, the socially sanctioned expression of heterosexuality—marriage—was a dangerous and degrading institution for women. In an era before birth control, women could not deny their husbands sex, and this could mean serial pregnancies for two decades or more… with the attendant toll on both psychological and physical health. It often meant too many children to protect or provide for. The rates for infant mortality were nearly as high as the rates for death in childbirth. Wives could be raped and beaten with impunity, could not inherit money, could not own their own wages, vote, serve on juries (critical factor in rape trials), could not own their children. Husbands could have insubordinate wives incarcerated indefinitely in mental asylums. This was still true through the middle of the twentieth century. It goes without saying she was expected to do the most low-paid and menial work.
The woman with enough self-esteem to insist on control of her body; the woman with dreams of creative, entrepreneurial, or intellectual work; and the woman whose childhood experiences of male sexuality were traumatic enough to preclude her fulfilling the obligations of the marriage bed had two choices: celibacy or lesbianism. Many women chose lesbianism. And many of these, not surprisingly, were women of achievement. Scratch around under the surface of these thousands of exceptional, historical spinsters, and you will usually find the lesbianism.
Women have always historically experienced lesbianism as a viable choice, because it has offered intimacy with emotional support, families without childbearing, and the potential for egalitarian, mutual, companionate partnerships, because both parties had equal rights—that is, equal disenfranchisement—under the law.
Many women have rarely, and still rarely, experience heterosexuality as a choice. It is instituted more as a regime, and a compulsory one at that. It is impossible to know whether or not women are really born heterosexual, since all women’s primary socialization for intimacy is same-sex, i.e. with our mothers; and then we are weaned away from that orientation by a never-ending barrage of aggressive narratives and images teaching us to desire men, even if they are animals (Beauty and the Beast), even if they live in an environment that is hostile to us (The Little Mermaid), and even if they have historically enslaved and exploited us (see above). This lifelong avalanche of propaganda is accompanied by sanctions against lesbianism that play out at all levels, from social censure to execution and incarceration. It is impossible to know if women are born heterosexual, or even if we choose it, when we might just be choosing a living wage, acceptance by our families, membership in our church, a career in the military, custody of our children, or having the career of our dreams. In many countries, women who sleep with men might just be choosing to stay alive.
There have always been women with pride, high moral principles, dignity, ambition, courage, and vision who chose and who still choose same-sex intimacy, because it is an empowering choice in a patriarchal culture.
The world has improved for women in the West… in some ways. In others, it has become a nightmare. Trafficking, pornography, prostitution are billion-dollar industries resulting in the exploitation and literal enslavement of millions of women and children. The entire culture has become inundated with pornography, so much so that stripper poles are used for aerobic exercise, popular music glorifies pimping, and girls’ fashions mimic clothing worn for soliciting sex.
Men in the US still make one-third more money than women. Men still rape and batter. Men still harass in the workplace. Men still outnumber women in media images five to one. Women are wildly underrepresented at all levels of government. It’s still very much a man’s world, at the expense of women’s safety, dignity, and independence.
Lesbianism is a proud and strategic choice for many of us, and we want people to understand that. We want women to know they have options. They can exercise choice over their desire. They don’t have accept their programming. And we want men to know that their violence against us is backfiring, that it is generating a spirit and a community of resistance and solidarity among women.
Many women have rarely, and still rarely, experience heterosexuality as a choice. It is instituted more as a regime, and a compulsory one at that. It is impossible to know whether or not women are really born heterosexual, since all women’s primary socialization for intimacy is same-sex, i.e. with our mothers; and then we are weaned away from that orientation by a never-ending barrage of aggressive narratives and images teaching us to desire men, even if they are animals (Beauty and the Beast), even if they live in an environment that is hostile to us (The Little Mermaid), and even if they have historically enslaved and exploited us (see above). This lifelong avalanche of propaganda is accompanied by sanctions against lesbianism that play out at all levels, from social censure to execution and incarceration. It is impossible to know if women are born heterosexual, or even if we choose it, when we might just be choosing a living wage, acceptance by our families, membership in our church, a career in the military, custody of our children, or having the career of our dreams. In many countries, women who sleep with men might just be choosing to stay alive.
There have always been women with pride, high moral principles, dignity, ambition, courage, and vision who chose and who still choose same-sex intimacy, because it is an empowering choice in a patriarchal culture.
The world has improved for women in the West… in some ways. In others, it has become a nightmare. Trafficking, pornography, prostitution are billion-dollar industries resulting in the exploitation and literal enslavement of millions of women and children. The entire culture has become inundated with pornography, so much so that stripper poles are used for aerobic exercise, popular music glorifies pimping, and girls’ fashions mimic clothing worn for soliciting sex.
Men in the US still make one-third more money than women. Men still rape and batter. Men still harass in the workplace. Men still outnumber women in media images five to one. Women are wildly underrepresented at all levels of government. It’s still very much a man’s world, at the expense of women’s safety, dignity, and independence.
Lesbianism is a proud and strategic choice for many of us, and we want people to understand that. We want women to know they have options. They can exercise choice over their desire. They don’t have accept their programming. And we want men to know that their violence against us is backfiring, that it is generating a spirit and a community of resistance and solidarity among women.
The thought of having sex with a man in the pornified culture we live in is repulsive to me. So often in public (say, today when a boy told me while i was walking down the street that he wanted to stick his dick in my mouth) I am merely treated as an object for male gratification and humiliation, it disgusts me to think about, and is by belief based on experience, possibly having a fully satisfying and non-coercive sexual relationship with a man.
I have been battling away on LGBT internet websites for several years now, accused of being a "fake" lesbian, not real, because I have proudly proclaimed I have chosen lesbianism as a logical and political choice. I have explained that choosing a sexuality which does not conform to the hetero-patriarchy is a good thing. To no avail, the LGBT people I have encountered fear that, to say such a thing, opens the doors for christians and others to get going again with their psychological and pseudo-medical practices in order to wipe us out. As if that could ever happen.
They also say that it's not possible to control our sexuality, that they "can't help" their feelings and so, they assume, no one else can help theirs either. But when a particular sexuality is labelled abnormal, and a genetic mistake, it is difficult for women to know that options involving sexuality with women are not closed to them at all. It's a "choice" we can make despite all of patriarchy's efforts to close down its beautiful possibilities.
There also seems to be fears among some radical feminist lesbians I've encountered lately that, somehow, to label oneself "political lesbian" means you aren't really attracted to lesbians. You're just pretending. The fear seems centred around the "funfem"/queer idea that, unless we're having lots of enjoyable sex, then our sexual identity isn't real. Well, I've been "pretending" for many years now and have had lots of fun, both sexual and non-sexual, along the way.
There are lesbians who understand that some people do choose to be that way even though they were born feeling like they liked girls. I'm bisexual and I understand that for some people it is a choice even though for me it wasn't. We aren't all that 'silly'.
Also, I have had people try to explain to me why they think that for all lesbians/gays/whatever that it's a choice and this is what they say, "they chose to express their feelings." Yes we do choose to express the feelings because it can get too hard to hide them away. But no matter what some do still feel that way in their mind without choosing.
Being lesbian sometimes is not a choice. I myself am I bisexual. Even when I was a child I knew something was different. I felt the same way about girls as I did boys. I never chose it. It just came naturally to me. I never chose to like both genders. It's how I have felt my whole life.
It is natural to be straight. It is natural to be gay. It is natural to be lesbian. And many more things are natural. For most people it comes straight to them. They do not choose it. They do not say to themselves one day, "you know what? I want to be gay! So now I'm gay! I like the same gender now."
I understand that for some people, it is a choice. But for a lot of people, it's not. It's something they have felt their whole life and they can't change it. They can just choose to be straight. Because it would be denying their own natural feelings.
What I'm wondering is that is the person who wrote this article straight or lesbian/bisexual. Because quite frankly, quite a lot of straight people do not understand that this is how we feel. (Notice how I didn't say all straight people aswell. Because there ARE a lot of straight people who do understand.)
That's all I have to say, I could go on forever. But right now, all I'm thinking is that you're the ignorant one, not us.
There is nothing wrong with this. Accepting the reality of genetics doesn't undermine a political or social or personal choice. Some of who and what we are was indeed decided by genes, and that's normal, not a 'defect', not a problem, not weird, not a thief of empowerment.
In human society, the majority of females are socialized to believe that they desire males to desire them, that having the male organ thrusting in them IS sex, that pregnancy is about "glowing" and giving birth is their highest purpose.
This, even though heterosexual thrusting delivers more bladder infections and pain than it does actual physical pleasure (let alone climax, which the taboo against girlhood masturbation ensures that most females will not experience at all before their very sexuality is sacrificed at the altar of pornified male-,pleasing such that "female sexuality" is now wholly conceptualized as the first derivative of male sexuality, a wanting what he wants).
This, even though pregnancy is a nine month parasitic takeover, marked by vomit, swelling, and vulnerability, culminating in excruciating pain both denied by Western medicine and sadomasochistically transmogrified into Earth Mother woo bullshit by the
midwife and doula crowd.
And sadly, many lesbians too have bought into this crap.
Once upon a time, lesbians were the females who DID NOT BUY INTO the bullshit of painful beauty rituals, the pain of having a big ugly man ram a part of you that had nothing to do with your pleasure, fertilize you like mud and have you swell up and squeeze out either yet another future rammer OR a future victim to rapiarchy. We loved girls as a girl, we knew how to make ourselves come, we saw nothing but misery in being some man's masturbation tool and some fetus' oven. Hell, even seeing our former best girlfriend's drooling over some wife-beating rapist celebrity rapper in a teen magazine broke our heart at age 11...to see her giggle over how much her ",bikini waxing" hurt at age 13, but how it was "worth it"...how "sex" hurt but would ",get better"... as she confided she "must have come" because it was "so intense, I was sore and bloody"...how at age 18 she hopes she gets pregnant to make "him" stop cheating, and at least feel like she did "something" with her life and has "someone" who will love her...and she hopes its a boy, because "girls end up hating their mothers...I know I did."
All heterosexuality is, is girls--who, unlike female mammals, are not all physically forced into being penetrated and impregnated--being brainwashed by our culture into choosing to be like non-human mammals while lying to themselves about loving it.
99 percent of popular culture is about making girls believe that they are worthless if they aren't fodder for a man's sexual desires to orgasm and reproduce. Look at "women's magazines"--if female heterosexuality was natural, there would be no need to instruct adult women to stay the course after years of adolescent instruction.
Men insist too on dominating ownership of money and property, because if all females were financially and emotionally secure, they would think twice about submitting to being pronged, or at least be willing to let go of their delusions about hetero copulation.
In a free world, all women and girls would realize the truth: that sex with a man is every bit as unpleasant as the physically-equivalent activities of a gynecological exam or tampon insertion. And in a world without rape, no woman would consent to this physically unpleasant act out of fear that he'd do it anyway. In a world where women's worth wasn't dependent upon male rankings, no woman would risk pain, pregnancy, bladder infections, STIs, and the real feelings of being some ugly Neanderthal's toilet just to ensure the illusion of ",love", "attractiveness", feeling ",normal", etc.
In a just world, all girls would love other girls at the very least. And if some grew up to be bisexual women, the idea of letting a man ram his rod into her internal organs would evoke the same bemusement as allowing a man to punch her in the face because she's just so pretty.
Of course, in this era where even lifelong lesbians profess to enjoy stripping, fisting, choking each other, and drooling over misogynist gay men, I'm not optimistic.
YOU seem to be saying that NONE of us are born that way, and that seems equally ignorant. My belief is that sexuality is on a spectrum and is a combination of nature/nurture, biology/free choice. Your arguments in favor of why a woman would choose lesbianism are, in my humble opinion, tired old chestnuts; and your sweeping generalizations are appalling: "Women have always historically experienced lesbianism as a viable choice." Really? All women?
I would actually tender a supplementary economics-based explanation as well.
Men and women are different (cause is irrelevant) and this results in divergent wants and needs. It also leads to transactional inequalities (men historically gaining more than they lose), elevated transaction costs and external costs as these two different groups pursue overlapping, yet divergent, pursuit of financial, emotional and sexual goals.
It seems entirely normal to me that some people (women and men) would choose to associate with a partner of a common gender. It tends to minimizes transactional inequality (cooperation is more likely with shared goals) and reduces transactional friction and external costs.
Even as a married man, I think some men would be a superior domestic partner than my wife simply because they more share my interests and gender habits and I'm certain my wife feels the same way in some regard (she is successful and very independent, but from a conservative upbringing and denies ever having lesbian interests).
The confounding factor is of course sexual interest. I have no interest in male sex partners and a strong interest in female sex partners. In economic terms, the utility value of heterosexual sexuality exceeds the costs of obtaining it ethically and justly.